The RBI vs. Government battle
is intensifying. The Narendra Modi government intends to keep pressing
demands for the country’s central bank to relax lending curbs and hand
over surplus reserves, amounting to whopping 3.6 lakh crore, even if it risks provoking a resignation
by the bank’s governor. After the debacle of demonetization and GST,
the Modi government is struggling to handle the economy of India. Modi’s
pet projects require huge sums of resources, which only RBI can
provide. It is thus important for the Modi government, who is desperate
to win the reelection next year, to gain full control of the RBI. This
battle has brought some important issues in open that I want to discuss
here.
Who owns the RBI?
RBI’s deputy governor Viral Acharya started this war by saying that undermining central bank independence could be “potentially catastrophic”.
The finance minister of India then fired back and since then the
pressure is mounting on RBI. In all these back and forth arguments, the
crucial issue that Indians must think about carefully is, who owns the
RBI? Is RBI truly an independent and autonomous institution as the
deputy governor is saying? The answer of this question can be found on
RBI’s website itself. Below is the screenshot (see figure 1) taken from
RBI’s website “About Us” section. I quote the relevant paragraph,
Though originally privately owned, since nationalisation in 1949, the Reserve Bank is fully owned by the Government of India.
Figure 1: Who Owns the RBI?
As one can see, the RBI itself is admitting that it is fully owned by
the Government of India. This means, the whole idea of RBI as an
independent and autonomous monetary institution is bogus and a
propaganda being perpetuated by the authorities to keep the public in
dark about its functioning. The whole concept that the money supply in
India is being managed by so-called professionals and so we should not
worry about it goes right out of window with the revelation of this
truth. If RBI is owned by the government then surely it is not
determining monetary policy independently. It is just fulfilling wishes
of its master government since 1949. The idea of its autonomy is just a
cover to hide this fact.
So how does the RBI fulfills wises of its master government?
What does the RBI do?
RBI’s website lists its major functions (see figure 2). The
consequences of RBI’s actions are very severe on the Indian economy.
They are mainly following:
Its interest rate manipulation results into the boom and bust cycles
into the economy which creates total havoc by skewing the capital and
production structure of the Indian economy and lowering our future
income.
It lowers the purchasing power of Indian currency rupee (inflation), which makes all of us poor year after year.
Its easy money policy results into widening income and wealth inequality in the country viz., the Cantillon effect.
Figure 2: RBI’s FunctionsWhat should be done about the RBI?
Looking at all the dangerous effects of RBI’s functioning it is
desirable that the Modi government dismantles it and takes over the
control of managing supply of rupee in its own hands.
One immediate effect of the dismantling of the RBI will be that the
time market, which sets the rate of interest, can now work freely
without any interference of the RBI. With the end of RBI’s interest rate
manipulation, the business cycles will end in India. This way the
Indian economy will be spared of the damage done to its capital and
production structure. In the absence of interest rate manipulation the
economy can now grow at its natural pace as determined by the societal
time preference i.e., decision of Indians to either consume in present
or save and invest in future.
Also, Inflation will now become much more visible. Visible because
when RBI creates rupees out of thin air, i.e., prints notes, it does it
in a clandestine and indirect way via government bond purchases viz.,
the open market operation (OMO).
But when the government will create rupees out of thin air by simply
printing it everyone will come to know who is responsible for creating
inflation in the economy. The fear of price inflation will keep the
governments in check. Governments will be forced to either balance their
budgets or go out of power. This will lower their interference in the
economy and our lives.
Conclusion
The on-going battle between the RBI vs. Government is a good chance
for the Indians to think carefully about the role of the central bank in
India. Central banks are very secretive institutions whose ugly impact
on our lives is difficult to imagine for most people. Since their
inception they have only done damage to all of us. It is better for all
of us that the RBI be dismantled, and if the Modi government does that
then we should not stop them.
I was recently reading Charles Mackay's famous book, Memoirs of Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds , which discusses some of the major popular delusions like the Mississippi bubble, the tulip mania, the south sea bubble, the alchemists, the witch mania, crusades etc., of the known human history. These popular delusions exhibit a kind of madness of crowd which we see every now and then in all ages and at all places wherever human beings are present. The evolutionary brain, which has primed human nature for a kind of herd behavior, is the root cause of this phenomena, but I won't discuss this matter at length here in this post. I want to focus on one such extraordinary popular delusion and madness of crowd type of episode which is right now on-going in India. This episode is of the cult of the popular chief minister of Gujarat, Narendra Modi. The crowd is in frenzy re his name. Many deluded people want him to be the next prime minister of India and rescue t...
Recently I sat down with Mr. Jayant Bhandari - Jayant Bhandari is an investment adviser, particularly in the natural resource sector, living in Canada. He advises institutional investors. - to discuss India, Gujarat, Narendra Modi, Liberty and Austrian Economics in India and other such relevant issues. The following is the audio podcast of our discussion.
A couple of days ago famous industrialist Ratan Tata commented about the lavish life style of another billionaire business tycoon Mukesh Ambani quoting his 27 storied Mumbai house viz., Antilla. Tata said that Mukesh Ambani's house Antilla represents the rich Indian's lack of empathy for the poor . His remarks: "The person who lives in there should be concerned about what he sees around him and [asking] can he make a difference. If he is not, then it's sad because this country needs people to allocate some of their enormous wealth to finding ways of mitigating the hardship that people have." Is Ratan Tata right in his remarks or is he misguided in his judgements? Is he aware about the role of an entrepreneur in an economy or is he ignorant of this basic economic fact? Or is his remarks has some underlying assumptions which make those remarks perfectly apt for Mukesh's lifestyle? Let me deal with these questions one by one. I take two scenarios to carr...
Comments
Post a Comment
Please leave a civilized and intelligent comment. Usage of bad language is strictly prohibited. I always welcome a healthy discussion.